The British Psychoanalytical Society
Home Information   Events   Reviews   Articles   Contact   UK Analysts Training  


Contents
 



The Bloomsbury Group



The Stephens:
Adrian (1889-1948)

and Karin (1889-1953)



The Stracheys:
James (1887-1967)

and Alix (1892-1973)



Joan Rivičre (1883-1962)



Hogarth Press



Psychoanalysis and the wider

Bloomsbury circle

 


Bloomsbury and Psychoanalysis
An Exhibition of Documents from the Archives of the British Psychoanalytical Society

Compiled by Polly Rossdale and Ken Robinson
Grateful thanks to Pearl King, Lynda Etan and Joe Robinson
 

Please note: All material on website is subject to copyright. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited. We are grateful to the trustees of the Melanie Klein Trust for giving us permission to include documents.

Click on thumbnail images to view documents and photographs. On most browsers you should then have the option of enlarging the image for greater clarity and detail.

The Bloomsbury Group

In the years immediately preceding the First
World War, two intellectual movements
coincided and showed remarkable mutual
interest. Many of the artists and writers who
gathered under the broad umbrella of the
Bloomsbury Group were fascinated by a new
science that was seeping across the Channel
from Europe. In particular, they were drawn by
the writing of Sigmund Freud. In 1913, Brill’s
translation of Interpretation of Dreams appeared
and The Psychopathology of Everyday Life
appeared the following year. Leonard Woolf
wrote a review of the latter for the New English
Weekly and Lytton Strachey wrote a then
unpublished piece on Freud. Ernest Jones’s
Papers on Psychoanalysis, published in 1912,
were also influential (for James Strachey and
Joan Rivičre, for example). And in 1913, he
founded the London Psychoanalytical Society.

 

 

 

In the years following the war the interest in

psychoanalysis grew. Jones dissolved the now defunct London Society and founded the British Psychoanalytical Society in 1919. In key figures from the Bloomsbury Group, psychoanalysis found not only analysts who could also teach others but translators who would play a vital role in the wider transmission of psychoanalysis.

The two families at the heart of the Bloomsbury Group, the Strachey and the Stephen families, both played significant roles in the development of psychoanalysis in Britain and beyond. But there were other more minor figures, like Sebastian Sprott, or figures on the edge of the Group, like Joan Rivičre, who also played their part (in Rivičre’s case an important one).

 

 

 


 

1. Lytton Strachey having his hair cut at Asheham

1913: Roger Fry, Clive Bell, Duncan Grant,

Lytton Strachey, Saxon Sydney Turner,

Vanessa Stephen

 

2. Dora Carrington, Stephen Tomlin, Lytton

Strachey, Sebastian Sprott

 

3. HTJ Norton, Clive Bell, Mary Hutchinson and

Sir John Hutchinson; (front) James Strachey,

Duncan Grant

 

4. Vanessa Stephen, Virginia Stephen and their

stepsister Stella Duckworth

 

5. Virginia Woolf

 

6. Duncan Grant, Adrian Stephen

 

7.Letter from Martin James to James Strachey, 11 December 1963, congratulating him on becoming an Honorary Member of the British Psychoanalytical Society and commenting on his speech at the Jubilee dinner held in 1963 to mark the 50th anniversary of the formation of the Society.

 

James jokes that as a young man fresh to psychoanalysis he thought Bloomsbury was Britain. (CSF/F09/28)

 


 

Following the death of their father, Sir Leslie

Stephen, in 1905 Vanessa, Virginia, Adrian

and Thoby moved into 46 Gordon Square.

This was to be the nucleus of what would

become known as the Bloomsbury Group.

Thursday evenings became a regular fixture for

friends that included Clive Bell (who proposed

to Vanessa the following year), George Bernard

Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, Saxon Sydney

Turner, Dora Carrington, EM Forster and

Sebastian Sprott. (Sprott trained as a clinical

psychologist at Cambridge and later translated

Freud’s New Introductory Lectures on

Psycho-analysis. He was also a lover of John

Maynard Keynes).


Many of these men, Keynes, Leonard Woolf, Lytton and James Strachey, Clive Bell and Saxon Sydney-Turner, had become friends through membership of the Apostles, a secret society at Cambridge. It was Lytton Strachey who encouraged his old friend Leonard Woolf to court Virginia Stephen. The subjects ranged over by the Bloomsbury Group were broad but psychoanalysis was an exciting and recurring theme around this time. By 1920, Ernest Jones notes in passing in a letter to Otto Rank that ‘Psa is mentioned in nearly every modern novel in England’. As psychoanalysts the Stephens and Stracheys maintained their contact with their families and their Bloomsbury friends.


 

The Stephens:
Adrian (1889-1948)

and Karin (1889-1953)

 

In Adrian Stephen, Bloomsbury and psychoanalysis met. He was born in 1883 into
an erudite and cultured background, the brother of Virginia Woolf and Vanessa Bell. As a student at Cambridge his sense of mischief and fun manifested itself in what became known as the Zanzibar Hoax. The Sultan of Zanzibar was visiting England and Adrian and his friends decided to dress up and impersonate the Sultan’s uncle (fearing that if they impersonated the Sultan himself they would be recognised and exposed).

They travelled to London, equipped themselves at a theatrical costumiers, sent a telegram to the Mayor of Cambridge informing him of the Sultan’s uncle’s imminent arrival. On returning to Cambridge, the hoaxers were escorted around the town and principal colleges on a grand tour.
The story was later leaked to The Daily Mail but they had got away with it.

They did not lose their taste for practical jokes. A few years later Adrian encouraged his sister Virginia and Duncan Grant to take part in another similar exploit, this time dressing up as the Emperor of Abyssina and his retinue. They informed the admiralty that the Emperor wished to visit the Channel Fleet of the British Navy and its flag ship the ‘Dreadnought’. They were received with the dignity and ceremony appropriate to their apparent standing. They talked in a mixture of Swahili and an invented language and Adrian acted as the group’s interpreter. Again their hoax was later revealed but the Navy were keen to keep scandal under wraps. It was not until much later when he was well established as an analyst that Adrian wrote up their exploits as The Dreadnought Hoax which was published in 1936 by Hogarth Press.
In 1907, Adrian was called to the bar at
Lincoln’s Inn and, in 1914, he married Karin
Costelloe, a fellow of Newnham College,
Cambridge, a niece by marriage and pupil of
Bertrand Russell. She was the most gifted woman philosophy student in Cambridge of her time.
In 1912, she had been elected to the Aristotelian Society and published a book on Bergson. When war broke out both Adrian and Karin (like Lytton and James Strachey and Leonard Woolf) became conscientious objectors. Amongst the manuscripts of the Stephens in the possession of the Archives there is one written by Karin ‘On Pacificism’. They spent the First World War working on a farm in Essex.


It was after the war that they both became
interested in training as psychoanalysts. In the inter-war period Ernest Jones was eager that those interested in psychoanalysis should have medical qualifications, and they duly trained as doctors. They both went into analysis with James Glover, until his untimely death in 1925 when Adrian went to Ella Sharpe and Karin to Sylvia Payne. They were accepted as Associate Members in 1927 and became full members in 1930/1.

During the Second World War, Adrian was
so angered by the anti-semitism that had pushed the Freuds and many others out of their homes that he abandoned his pacifist stance and joined the Royal Army Medical Corps as an army psychiatrist. Amongst the Stephen manuscripts is a paper by Adrian entitled simply ‘Anti-Semitism’. John Bowlby has left a memorable pen-picture of Adrian in this period. In May 1942, he was posted to the military hospital at Northfield, Birmingham where Rickman and Bion were working. Karin joined up as a driver in the Queen’s Messenger Flying Squad Food Convoy. During and after the war, Adrian drew on his legal training to take a lead in the constitutional reform of the British Society.
Karin suffered from manic-depression and from increasingly-severe deafness. Leonard Woolf tried to her help her through a particularly low period in the 1940s by encouraging her to write a biography of Freud. She finally committed suicide.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Adrian Stephen as a boy in sailor uniform

 

9. Karin Stephen dressed as a Quaker. Karin

like Adrian loved fancy dress but she also

had Quaker origins

 

10. The Zanzibar Hoax

 

11. The Dreadnought Hoax

 

12. Daily Mirror cartoon showing the

Dreadnought Hoax

 

13. Karin Stephen, Adrian Stephen and their

daughter Anne, Chilling, 1919

 

14. Adrian and Karin Stephen and Virginia

Woolf

 

15. Adrian Stephen with pigs in Loom Lane

during his service as a conscientious

objector in 1917

 

16. King’s Head which Karin first rented in

1924 and bought in 1932. It stands on

the Handford Water near Harwich on the

Essex coast

 

17. Adrian Stephen in military uniform

 

18. An excerpt from Karin Stephen’s 1927 diary

recording her life on return home from a trip

to the USA. (KS/03)

 

 

 

19. Letter from Adrian Stephen to Sylvia Payne, 21 January 1937, proposing an item for the British Psychoanalytical Society board-meeting agenda: ‘To consider the principles

guiding the training committee in their

selection of candidates with special

reference to the need or otherwise of

requiring medical qualification’.

(G01/BB/F01/02C)

 

20. Letters from Adrian and Karin Stephen to

Edward Glover, 9 June 1939, setting out

their qualifications and experience for

practice in the emergency of war.

(CSB/F16/01 and 02)

 

21. Letter from Adrian Stephen to Sylvia Payne, 6 July 1939, about a proposal that the rules of the British Psychoanalytical Society be made public to members. (CSB/F16/03)

 

22. Extract from John Bowlby’s 1985 typescript ‘Memories of BPAS Analysts’, giving his penportraits of the Stephens. (CBC/F09/06)

 

23. Psychoanalytic papers by the Stephens

‘They were … "Bloomsbury", a badge they wore with a pride equal to that with which they called themselves psychoanalysts.’
 

[Perry Meisel and Walter Kendrick in The letters of James and Alix Strachey 1924-25, (1986)].

 

 

 

 


 

The Stracheys:
James (1887-1967)

and Alix (1892-1973)

 

24. James Strachey

24 James Strachey


 

 

After graduation from Cambridge, Alix Sargant-

Florence moved with her brother to Bloomsbury

and here became familiar with the group that

would define her social world. James Strachey

and Alix had known each other since 1910

but it was meeting through Bloomsbury that

consolidated their relationship. They married

in 1920 and that year went, through Jones,

to Vienna to meet and be analysed by Freud.

Freud had already admired the work of James’

brother, Lytton, and was keen for James to begin translation and spread psychoanalysis in

England. ‘In the Stracheys … Freud found the

precise embodiment of what England, his

favourite country, meant to him.’ (ibid.)

James came to psychoanalysis through his

interest in the Society for Psychical Research.

It seems that at some point during the war Ernest Jones had advised him that, if interested in pursuing a career in psychoanalysis, he should undergo medical training but he gave up

medical school after only three weeks. James

became an Associate Member of the British

Society in February 1922. When Alix went to

Berlin to begin an analysis under Karl Abraham

in 1924, James stayed in London living with,

amongst others, Adrian Stephen.

 

 

 

 

 

James Strachey was an influential teacher

and analyst. His paper, ‘The Nature of the

Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis’ (1934),

has become a classic. But he became

increasingly engaged in the translation of Freud.

He and Alix took on the task of translating the

material for the third volume of Freud’s Collected Papers and he himself was responsible for the fifth and final volume. After Freud’s death in 1939, he accepted with Alix’s assistance the challenge of preparing the standard edition of Freud’s psychological writings in English, withdrawing eventually from analytic work.
 

He and Alix were in demand as translators and

commentators. Ernst Freud asked them, for

example, whether they would undertake to

translate Freud’s neurological writings. The

significance of Strachey’s work on the standard

edition is all the greater because after the

emigration of analysts from Berlin and Vienna

under Nazi persecution English became the

dominant international language for

psychoanalysis.

 

 

 

 


25. Wilfred Bion, as President of the British Psychoanalytical Society presenting be to James Strachey at a dinner in 1966 celebrate the completion of Standard Edition. The photograph shows Donald Winnicott, Anna Freud, Bion, and James Strachey. Leonard Woolf as well as Anna Freud and Wilfred Bion spoke at the dinner.
25. Wilfred Bion, as President of the British
Psychoanalytical Society presenting book
to James Strachey at a dinner in 1966 to
celebrate the completion of Standard
Edition. The photograph shows Donald
Winnicott, Anna Freud, Bion, and James
Strachey. Leonard Woolf as well as Anna
Freud and Wilfred Bion spoke at the dinner.


 

26. Photograph of the dinner held to celebrate the 50th Jubilee of the formation of the British Psychoanalytical Society, at which James Strachey spoke. (Both Stracheys appear on the photograph).

26. Photograph of the dinner held to celebrate

the 50th Jubilee of the formation of the British

Psychoanalytical Society, at which James

Strachey spoke. (Both Stracheys appear on

the photograph.)


 

27. Alix Strachey
27. Alix Strachey


 

28. Letter from Maynard Keynes at 46 Gordon Square to James Strachey, his neighbour at number 41, 12 July 1929, remarking that Ernest Jones's ‘forecast written in 1916, as to the troubles in which the passion to return to gold would involve this country must be reckoned one of the triumphs of psychoanalysis’. (CSD/F03/06)
28. Letter from Maynard Keynes at 46 Gordon

Square to James Strachey, his neighbour at

number 41, 12 July 1929, remarking that

Ernest Jones's ‘forecast written in 1916, as

to the troubles in which the passion to return

to gold would involve this country must be
reckoned one of the triumphs of psychoanalysis’.

(CSD/F03/06)
By permission of the Provost and Scholars of King's College, Cambridge.


 

29. Letter from James Strachey to Ernest Jones, 18 January 1956, mentioning editing letters between Virginia Woolf and Lytton Strachey. (CSD/F04/56)  page 2

29. Letter from James Strachey to Ernest Jones,

18 January 1956, mentioning editing letters

between Virginia Woolf and Lytton

Strachey. (CSD/F04/56)


 

30. Letter from Ernst Freud to James Strachey, 6 March 1959, agreeing to the inclusion of a letter by Lytton Strachey in the German selection of Freud’s letters. The letter did not appear in the English selection. (CSF/F01/21)

30. Letter from Ernst Freud to James Strachey,

6 March 1959, agreeing to the inclusion

of a letter by Lytton Strachey in the German

selection of Freud’s letters. The letter did not

appear in the English selection.

(CSF/F01/21)


 

   

 

31. Letter from James Strachey to Ernest Jones,

18 July 1945, setting out amongst other

things how he came to be interested in

psychoanalysis. (CSD/F03/08)


 

32. Letter from Ignacio Matte Blanco to James Strachey, 29 November 1963, paying tribute to Strachey’s teaching as he remembered it from 1936-37. (CSF/F09/26).

32. Letter from Ignacio Matte Blanco to James

Strachey, 29 November 1963, paying

tribute to Strachey’s teaching as he

remembered it from 1936-37.

(CSF/F09/26)


 

33. Envelope and Letter from Donald Winnicott to Alix Strachey, 26 April 1967, recording his indebtedness to James Strachey ‘for his classical analysis of me – a quite ill person’. (CSH/F02/08)  Page 1

Page 2

33. Letter from Donald Winnicott to Alix

Strachey, 26 April 1967, recording his

indebtedness to James Strachey ‘for his

classical analysis of me – a quite ill person’.

(CSH/F02/08)



x

34. Letter from Ernest Jones to James Strachey,

28 September 1939. Jones missed

Strachey at Freud’s funeral and sets out plans

for various memorials to Freud, including an

English translation of the complete works.

(CSD/F03/70)


 

x

35. Letter from Ernest Jones to James Strachey,

19 October 1939, giving details of the

committee appointed to consider the

possibility of an English translation of the

complete works. The committee would

consist of Anna Freud, Sylvia Payne, Joan

Rivičre, James Strachey, John Rickman and

Jones himself. (CSD/F03/71)


 

36. Letter from Ruth Usher, as Honorary Business Secretary of the Institute of Psychoanalysis, 18 February 1948, to James Strachey agreeing remuneration for his ‘expenses in connection with the proposed publication of Freud’s Collected Works’. (CSF/F07/16)

36. Letter from Ruth Usher, as Honorary Business

Secretary of the Institute of Psychoanalysis,

18 February 1948, to James Strachey

agreeing remuneration for his ‘expenses in

connection with the proposed publication of

Freud’s Collected Works’. (CSF/F07/16)


 

37. Letter from Ernest Jones to James Strachey and Joan Rivičre, 9 March 1940, setting out progress on the possible English translation of Freud’s complete works. (G10/BG/F02/41)

37. Letter from Ernest Jones to James Strachey

and Joan Rivičre, 9 March 1940, setting

our progress on the possible English

translation of Freud’s complete works.

(G10/BG/F02/41)


 

38. Letter from James Strachey to Ernest Jones, 25 September 1952, showing him at work on the Rat Man case for the Standard Edition. (CSD/F03/64)  p2

38. Letter from James Strachey to Ernest Jones,

25 September 1952, showing him at work

on the Rat Man case for the Standard

Edition. (CSD/F03/64)


 

39. Letter from James Strachey to Ernest Jones, 25 August 1955, illustrating how Strachey’s work on the Standard Edition and Jones’s work on the biography were intertwined. Strachey relies on Jones’s work to produce his editorial notes to each opus. (CSD/F04/49) p 2

39. Letter from James Strachey to Ernest Jones,

25 August 1955, illustrating how Strachey’s

work on the Standard Edition and Jones’s

work on the biography were intertwined.

Strachey relies on Jones’s work to produce

his editorial notes to each opus.

(CSD/F04/49)


 

x

40. Letter from James Strachey to Ernest Jones,

7 September 1953, voicing Strachey’s

annoyance at a ‘sickening’ TLS review. He

has ‘recently had a newly invented and

rather more severe operation’ on his eye.

(CSD/F04/05)


 

 41. Letter from James Strachey to Joan Rivičre, 16 January 1962, showing how much Strachey’s relations with Hogarth Press had deteriorated since Leonard Woolf’s retirement. (CRC/F02/18) p2

41. Letter from James Strachey to Joan Rivičre,

16 January 1962, showing how much

Strachey’s relations with Hogarth Press

had deteriorated since Leonard Woolf’s

retirement. (CRC/F02/18)


 

42. Letter from Wilfred Bion to James Strachey, 30 May (CSF/F09/05).  42. Letter from Wilfred Bion to James Strachey, 10 November 1963, (CSF/F09/023)

42. Letters from Wilfred Bion to James Strachey,

30 May and 10 November 1963, asking

him to make a speech at the Jubilee dinner

and thanking him for speaking.

(CSF/F09/05 and 23)


 

43. James Strachey’s speech at the 1963 Jubilee dinner, Page 1 43. James Strachey’s speech at the 1963 Jubilee dinner, Page 2

43. James Strachey’s speech at the 1963 Jubilee

dinner, taken from the booklet published by

the Society for the 50th Anniversary in

1963.


 

44. Letter from John Klauber to James Strachey,6 December 1963, confirming that he has been elected an Honorary Member of the British Psychoanalytical Society in recognition of his outstanding service as a teacher, writer, translator and editor of the Standard Edition. (CSF/F09/27)

44. Letter from John Klauber to James Strachey,

6 December 1963, confirming that he has

been elected an Honorary Member of the

British Psychoanalytical Society in

recognition of his outstanding service as a

teacher, writer, translator and editor of the

Standard Edition. (CSF/F09/27)


 

x

45. Letter from Roger Money-Kyrle to Dorothy

Fanshawe, 5 April 1936, recommending

Alix Strachey as a ‘first class analyst’.

(CMC/F01/10)


 

x

46. Letter from Hanna Fenichel to James

Strachey, 16 May 1951, thanking him and

setting out their agreement that the Stracheys

would help to polish the English of David

Rapaport’s translation of Otto Fenichel’s

papers. (CSC/F21/09)


47. Letter from Masud Khan, as editor of the International Psychoanalytical Library, to Alix Strachey, 3 September 1970

47. Letter from Masud Khan, as editor of the

International Psychoanalytical Library, to

Alix Strachey, 3 September 1970, thanking

her for taking ‘a militant and definite stand

vis a vis Angela Harris, without which the

24th Volume [of the Standard Edition]

would never have achieved actualisation’.

(CSF/F04/30)